data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4f0c9/4f0c94508202e068887cfd3067d3c3f988f5e76b" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/52c89/52c89533afc6ac4bcaea9733fe9c410f303b0438" alt=""
I believe the personality type fits me well, and am assured by the fact that I’ve taken this test two other times, and received the same results. The majority of how I am described is accurate; my introversion, my love for learning, my high expectations, my combination of imaginability and function. However the aspect of being determined I feel might be slightly inaccurate, as even when I care deeply about something, I have to muster up the energy to actually carry it out. Moreover, it is as close to me as anything could get. It definitely helps me understand why I am gravitated towards the things I am, such as philosophy and physics. It’s how my thought process works, very abstract but trying to pick up on patterns and evidence.
INTJ clarifies my role in a team, as it describes me of having the potential to be a leader, but letting someone else take the role if they offer it. The introversion is the most evident, as in social situations I alienate myself frequently, and tend to stick around reserved, quiet people unless I am in a certain mood. As for people’s perception of me, I believe one of the statements I identified most with was the statement that I expect an exhausting amount of openness of people whom I have relationships with. People have definitely misunderstood my intentions because I have an odd way of having friendships with people.
I’ve learned that I wasn’t wrong in my thoughts that being a physicist or philosopher would be well suited for me. Dually that the people a person tends to look up to are similar to themselves, personality-wise.
No comments:
Post a Comment